Thursday, February 16, 2012

Poetry Out Loud Poem (:

Adam’s CurseBy William Butler Yeats

We sat together at one summer’s end,
That beautiful mild woman, your close friend,   
And you and I, and talked of poetry.
I said, ‘A line will take us hours maybe;
Yet if it does not seem a moment’s thought,   
Our stitching and unstitching has been naught.   
Better go down upon your marrow-bones   
And scrub a kitchen pavement, or break stones   
Like an old pauper, in all kinds of weather;   
For to articulate sweet sounds together
Is to work harder than all these, and yet   
Be thought an idler by the noisy set
Of bankers, schoolmasters, and clergymen   
The martyrs call the world.’
                                          And thereupon
That beautiful mild woman for whose sake   
There’s many a one shall find out all heartache   
On finding that her voice is sweet and low   
Replied, ‘To be born woman is to know—
Although they do not talk of it at school—
That we must labour to be beautiful.’
I said, ‘It’s certain there is no fine thing   
Since Adam’s fall but needs much labouring.
There have been lovers who thought love should be   
So much compounded of high courtesy   
That they would sigh and quote with learned looks   
Precedents out of beautiful old books;   
Yet now it seems an idle trade enough.’

We sat grown quiet at the name of love;   
We saw the last embers of daylight die,   
And in the trembling blue-green of the sky   
A moon, worn as if it had been a shell   
Washed by time’s waters as they rose and fell   
About the stars and broke in days and years.

I had a thought for no one’s but your ears:   
That you were beautiful, and that I strove   
To love you in the old high way of love;
That it had all seemed happy, and yet we’d grown   
As weary-hearted as that hollow moon.

How does Achebe's presentation of Africa in "Things Fall Apart," differ from what you know of Conrad's presentation? (:

The novel Things Fall Apart differs a lot from the book Heart of Darkness.  Having yet to start the latter novel, it is possible to say that Achebe’s story presents a more in depth, equal view of the customs and beliefs of Africa.  Conrad’s novel appears to be narrow-minded and one-sided.  Both novels present very different views, but while one is fair, the other is cruel.
            In Achebe's critique, Heart of Darkness gives the reader a horrible view of the customs of Africa.  They are cannibals, and are savage in everything they do.  Africans are viewed as ignorant, despite any education they receive.  According to Achebe, Africans in Heart of Darkness made “‘a violent babble of uncouth sounds,’” and “‘exchanged short grunting phases’”.  In Things Fall Apart, Africans are presented like a group of settled people, with their own beliefs, traditions, and laws.
           Both of these novels are different and each present a very different view of Africa.  The former presents a fair view, comparing practices between the world and Africa.  The latter offers a cruel view, degrading the differences between cultures of Africa and Europeans.  

What does Achebe say about Conrad's views of the "kinship" between Europe and Africa, between Europeans and Africans? (:

  In the critique, Achebe believes Conrad’s views of “kinship” between Europe and Africa, as well as Africans and Europeans, is narrow-minded.  Actually, Achebe believes Heart of Darkness presents a very racist image of Africa.  Conrad’s novel upheld the Europeans as innocent, good-intentioned people, while Africans were described as savage and dumb.
           All through the "Image of Africa," descriptions of the novel give readers an idea of how Conrad unfairly illustrates Africans.  Achebe is disgusted when an African pronounces, “‘Mistah Kurtz- he dead’”.  Conrad does allow relationships to develop between Mr. Kurtz and the Africans, but the kinship seen between Europeans could never cultivate between Africans and Europeans.  Relationships of the latter are very teacher/pupil and Achebe believes Conrad is presenting an unfair assessment of the possibility of budding relationships between different cultures.

What does Achebe say about Conrad's portrayal of good and evil? (:


The critique “Image of Africa,” the author Achebe describes Conrad’s portrayal of good and evil as racist, and one-sided.  He feels the story of Mr. Kurtz’ journey through Africa presents a dishonest view of the Africans as evil.  Heart of Darkness seems to portray the difference between good and evil as the veil that separates the cultures of Europe and Africa.
            In the critique, Achebe describes how Conrad seemed obsessed with the Africans’ behavior, customs, and appearances.  Achebe depicts, “‘A black figure stood up, strode on long black legs, waving long black arms . . ..’ as though we might expect a black figure striding along on black legs to wave white arms!”  Conrad is portraying African’s as evil simply because their culture clashes with that of others.  Achebe believes Conrad’s view is racist, and wrong.  Good and evil cannot be defined as the difference between cultural practices.

An Image of Africa (:


The title is called “An Image of Africa” because Heart of Darkness has a small description of the country.  Conrad was illustrating the story of Mr. Kurtz’ journey through Africa, but as Achebe points out, the author is also describing the “uncivilized” behavior and looks of the African people.  Heart of Darkness delivers a tale of a man, as well as a somewhat one-sided view of Africa.
            In the critique, Achebe describes the racism evident throughout the novel.   He believes the book is displaying a narrow-minded view of Africa:
Heart of Darkness projects the image of Africa as "the other world," the antithesis of Europe and therefore of civilization, a place where man's vaunted intelligence and refinement are finally mocked by triumphant bestiality.
Achebe is appalled by the racist image of Africa Conrad presents to his audience.  He could easily have fixated an angry modifier to the title, but he let the simplicity show his disgust.  “An Image of Africa” informs readers that Heart of Darkness is but one side of the tale of Africa.  Achebe’s critique confirms that Heart of Darkness is only one, racist outlook of Africa.

Letter to Representative (:


Dear Senator,
         Some recent events have led the government to create two new bills, SOPA and PIPA, to ensure and protect copyright owners. The government would have control over all the content on the Internet. I don’t think that these bills should be passed because the Internet is a place to be free and open with expression. To protect the Internet from being shut down, falsely accused, and overthrown, SOPA and PIPA should not be passed at all.
         As an American, we have the right to the freedom of speech and press. The generation we live in now is heavily influenced by technology and the digital age. The Internet is a way to express ones self. The bills SOPA and PIPA would shut down any site that has a copyright infringement, whether they mean to or not. There are sites that are very popular that have the money and are safe from copyright problems, but other small, unpopular sites will suffer the punishment because of these bills being passed. In order to protect the rights of these small websites, people need to oppose the passing of SOPA and PIPA.
         Websites often feature various ads in order to maintain their status.  This allows a site to be open to viewing, posting, and editing information; however, many sites have no control over the content posted by consumers and advertisers.  This danger could lead to false accusations against small websites that cannot control content.  The Internet is meant to be free and open, but SOPA and PIPA would allow mainstream, or basically rich, websites to run, while privately ran websites take the rap.  In order to ensure equal rights of Internet use, SOPA and PIPA must not pass.
            There are all alternatives that could protect consumers and copyright owners alike.  SOPA and PIPA could be revised to allow small websites leeway in terms of user-posted content and advertisement.  Foreign sites would be at risk as well; therefore, these bills should protect against the possible blockade of these sites.  All consumers deserve the open and free Internet, and the laws should be made in interest of all consumers.  Another solution could include producing copyright laws in regard to the Internet.  SOPA and PIPA should not be passed without revisions or replacements in order to insure the free and open nature of the Internet.
            Senator Paul, oppose SOPA and PIPA to ensure the rights of the citizens you represent.  Consumers have the right to freedom of press, including the massive Internet.  User-created content cannot be liable means to shut down a website.  False accusations would definitely occur with the current means of advertising, especially for small sites.  Oppose SOPA and PIPA to ensure the rights of both consumers and website operators.  Vote for the revision of these bills, as well as the introduction of new bills.  Protect consumers from future problems, and oppose SOPA and PIPA.

Friday, February 10, 2012

The First Q & A's 1/18/2011 (:

1. SOPA is the Stop Online Piracy Act.  This bill would give the U.S. government more power to control websites with copyright issues. It's supposed to limit how we used the internet. 
2. PIPA is the Protect IP Act.  This bill, which is similar to SOPA, would give the government the ability to control websites regarding copyright material. It, in a way, also limits our use of the internet. 
3. There are people who do not feel the bills will protect them from false accusations.  If ads and various links on the site lead to sites with copyright problems, the site must pay.  I don't think it's fair that just because we visit a site with an ad that needs to be payed for, we have to pay for it just because we stumbled upon it.