In my opinion, I think that my letter to Mr. Leeper was well written, but i didn't really have that many supporting details. I mean my argument was great about how I think Wikipedia should be used in schools as a reliable search engine. Many people don't think that Wikipedia is a reliable source because people have the ability to change what is written on their site. As for Google, they gather sites that others have made all over the net instead of making their own articles. It's different in a way.
My letter explained why Wikipedia should be allowed to be used, but I honestly don't think my explanations were as string as they could be. I could have used some vocabulary and explained more about the results we gathered from our experiment, but I didn't think about at the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment